(Bloomberg) -- The Church of England Pensions Board will offload its stake in Shell Plc as part of a total exit from oil and gas, as the influential investor turns its back on companies it says are failing to address climate risks.
After years of trying to engage with management boards, it’s now clear that Shell and a number of its peers don’t have “sufficient ambition to decarbonize in line with the aims of the Paris Agreement,” John Ball, chief executive officer of the CofE Pensions Board, said in an emailed statement on Thursday.
Read More: Shell Called On by UK’s Top Fund Manager to Explain CO2 Math
Shell said last week it intends to devote an ever larger chunk of annual spending to oil and gas, a strategy that’s been dubbed “catastrophic” by climate activists. Shell says it can still deliver on its pledge to shareholders to eliminate emissions by mid-century, but didn’t say how. At the same time, the company signaled it will restrict spending on renewable energy projects to those it thinks can compete with the returns of its fossil-fuel business.
The move is not only angering investors but also some employees. Steffen Krutzinna, a power trader at Shell, decided to quit because of his employer’s renewed embrace of oil and gas, according a post on LinkedIn. The change in strategy, announced by Chief Executive Officer Wael Sawan on June 14, shows Shell is putting short-term profits above social and environmental responsibilities, he wrote.
Exits driven by concerns around environmental, social and governance metrics are starting to pick up amid evidence the fossil fuel industry isn’t doing anywhere near enough to cut emissions. Shell’s strategy pivot has led some of the world’s biggest investors to question its commitment to previously stated climate goals.
Legal & General Investment Management, the UK’s largest asset manager, said it wants Shell to explain how it thinks it can continue to cut emissions while ratcheting up investments in fossil fuels. Velliv, a Danish pension fund, is also in the process of dumping Shell as it divests about 200 billion kroner ($3.4 billion) of high-carbon assets.
Such divestments, even if they only represent a small fraction of a company’s shares, can have an outsized impact. According to a paper published earlier this year by academics at Harvard University and Boston University among others, stigmatizing companies adds to the risk of stranded assets, especially if divestments get a lot of public attention.
The Church of England Pensions Board most recently held £1.35 million ($1.73 million) across equity and debt in Shell, and about £7 million in equity and debt across oil and gas companies in its common investment fund, it said.
Though the CofE Pensions Board only looks after about £3.2 billion in assets, it’s managed to punch above its weight due to its key role in a number of investor coalitions. These include efforts to work with the mining industry as part of a broader focus on bringing about a low-carbon transition.
A separate Church investing body, the Church Commissioners for England, which manages a £10.3 billion endowment fund, also said on Thursday it is blacklisting oil and gas majors from its portfolio. What’s more, the investor will exclude all other companies “primarily engaged” in the exploration, production and refining of oil or gas, unless they are “in genuine alignment” with a 1.5C pathway, by the end of 2023, it said.
In 2021, the Church Commissioners excluded 20 oil and gas majors, and will now also exclude BP, Ecopetrol, Eni, Equinor, ExxonMobil, Occidental Petroleum, Pemex, Repsol, Sasol, Shell, and Total, “after concluding that none are aligned with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement.”
The CofE Pensions Board’s decision to divest from oil and gas marks a rare exit by the investor, which typically prefers to work with companies to help them transition. Other notable divestments to date include iron ore and nickel producer Vale SA, after a mining waste damn collapsed and killed 270 people.
The investor has a particular history with Shell, after it co-led engagement with the oil major on behalf of a $68 trillion investor group, Climate Action 100+. That work was seen as instrumental in bringing about Shell’s 2020 net zero emissions pledge.
Read More: Church’s $40 Trillion Social Investing Push Gets a Reality Check
“There is a significant misalignment between the long term interests of our pension fund and continued investment in companies seeking short term profit maximization at the expense of the ambition needed to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement,” Ball said. “Recent reversals of previous commitments, most notably by BP and Shell, has undermined confidence in the sector’s ability to transition.”
(Adds context throughout.)
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.
